Journal:

2015. 23 (1)

Publicatione: 
THE ‘CALIFORNICUS’ CONUNDRUM

Author:

Griffiths D. A.


About author:

Griffiths D. A., Agrobio S P, Ctra. Nacional 340, Km 419, El Viso (La Mojonera) Almeria, 04745, Spain Acarology Consultants 3, Sunray Avenue, West Drayton, Middlesex, UB7 7AH England

Annotation:

The sixty years of taxonomic history surrounding the specific epithet ‘californicus’ is reviewed. Original descriptions of the major works, so involved, are evaluated for taxonomic accuracy. The perplexities which have been engendered during this period are discussed. It is proposed that a species complex composed of some eight taxa, representing six species, surrounds the original Typhlodromus californicus McGregor, 1954, namely; Typhlodromus mungeri McGregor, 1954; Typhlodromus chilenensis Dosse, 1958; Amblyseius californicus (McGregor), sensu Cakmak & Cobanoglu, 2006; Amblyseius californicus (McGregor), 1954, sensu Schuster & Pritchard, 1963; Cydnodromus californicus (McGregor) Athias-Henriot, 1977; Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) sensu Tixier et al., 2008; Neoseiulus wearnei (Schicha), 1987, sensu Tixier et al. 2013; Neoseiulus californicus sensu lato, Xu et al., 2013. The first four listed are considered to be discrete species. The fifth, the A. californicus of Schuster & Pritchard, generally accepted to represent a definitive re-description of McGregor’s californicus, is itself a discrete species. The californicus taxon of Athias-Henriot, 1977 and of Tixier et al., 2008, and wearnei of Schicha, 1987 are considered to represent just one species. The taxon of Xu et al. 2013 is morphologically very similar to this species, but as these authors so stated it is not identical to their taxon. The taxon, of Athias-Henriot 1977, Tixier et al. 2008 and Schicha 1987, is being sold world-wide by commercial producers of phy-
toseiid predator mites under the mistaken label Neoseiulus or Amblyseius californicus. The identity of field records carrying the specific label ‘californicus’ are believed now not to be reliable.

Bibliography:

Athias-Henriot, C. 1959. Acariens planticoles
d’Algerie, I, 5e contribution au genre Amblyseius
Berlese (Phyytoseiidae), II. Premiere liste
d’Actinchitnosi (Cheyletidae, Caligonellidae,
Hemisarcoptidae). Acad. R. Sci. Lett. B. Arts Belg.
Ser. 5, 45: 150–153.

Athias-Henriot, C. 1977. Nouvelles notes sur les Am-
blyseiinae. III. sur le genre Cydnodromus: redefi-
nition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytosei-
idae). Entomophaga, 22: 61–73.

Beard, J.J. 2001. A review of Australian Neoseiulus,
Hughes and Typhlodromips de Leon (Acari: Phy-
toseiidae: Amblyseiinae). Invert. Syst., 15: 17–
158.

Cakmak, I. and Cobanoglu, S. 2006. Amblyseius cali-
fornicus (McGregor) 1954 (Acari: Phytoseiidae),
a new record for the Turkish fauna. Turkish Jour-
nal of Zoology, 30: 55–58.

Caresche, L.A. and Wapshere, A.J. 1974. Biology and
host specificity of the Chondrilla gall mite, Aceria
chondrillae (G. Can.) (Acarina, Eriophyidae).
Bulletin of Entomological Research, 64: 183–192.

Chant, D.A. 1959. Phytoseiidae mites (Acarina: Phyto-
seiidae), Part I. Bionomics of seven species in
south-east England. Part II. A taxonomic review of
the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of thir-
ty-eight new species. The Canadian Entomologist
Supplement, 12.

Chant, D.A. and McMurtry, J.A. 2003. A review of the
subfamilies Amblyseiinae (Acarina: Phytosei-
idae), Part II. Neoseulini new tribe. International
Journal of Acarology, 29: 3–46.

Chant, D.A. and Yoshida’Shaul, E. 1991. Adult dorsal
setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari:
Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology,
17 (3): 187–199.

Chant, D.A. and Yoshida-Shaul, E. 1991. Adult ventral
setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari:
Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology,
17: 187–199.

Cullen, J.M. and Wearne, G.R., 1973. Commonwealth
Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation,
Division of Entomology Annual Report, 1972-3,
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Dosse, G. 1958. Uber einige neue Raumilbenarten (Ac-
ari: Phytoseiidae). Pflansezschutz Berichte, 21:
44–61.

Guichou, S., Tixier, M.-S. and Kreiter, S. 2006. Assess-
ment of morphological and molecular variation
among strains of the species Neoseiulus californi-
cus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). In ‘Pro-
ceedings of the International Congress of Acarol-
ogy, Amsterdam, August 2006’.

Griffiths, D.A. 1964. Experimental studies of the sys-
tematics of the genus Acarus, Linnaeus, 1758
(Sarcopttiformes: Acarina). Acarologia, Fasc. h.
s. C. R. Ier Congres. D’Acarology, Fort Collins,
Col., U.S.A., 1963.

Jeffrey, C. 1989. Biological Nomenclature, 3rd ed. Pub-
lisher Edward Arnold, London.
Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species
from the point of view of a zoologist. Columbia
University Press, New York.

Mayer, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Har-
vard University Press, Cambridge, Massachu-
setts.

McMurtry, J.A. 1977. Some predaceous mites (Phyto-
seiidae) on citrus in the Mediterranean region. En-
tomophaga 22: 19–30.

McMurtry, J.A. and Badii, M. 1989. Reproductive
compatibility in widely separated populations of
three species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytosei-
idae), Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 65: 397–402.

McGregor, E.A. 1954. Two new mites in the genus
Typhlodromus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Southern
California Academy of Science Bulletin, 53: 89–
92.

Moraes, G.J., McMurtry, J.A., Denmark, H.A., and
Campos, C.B. 2004. A revised catalogue of the
mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 431: 1–494.

Muma, M.H. 1961. Subfamilies, genera and species of
Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bull. Fla.
St. Mus., Biol. Sci., 5: 267–302.

Ragusa, S. 2003. Description of a new genus and of two
new species of phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes:
Phytoseiidae) collected in Chile. Acarologia, 43:
337–344.

Schuster, R.O. and Pritchard, A.E. 1963. Phytoseiid
mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 191–285.

Tixier, M., Guichou, S. and Kreiter, S. 2008. Morpho-
logical variation in the biological agent Neosei-
ulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytosei-
idae): consequences for diagnostic reliabilities
and synonyms. Invertebrate Systematics, 22: 453–
469.

Tixier, M., Otto, J., Kreiter, S., Santos, V. Dos, and
Beard, J. 2013. Is Neoseiulus wearnei the Neoseu-
lius californicus of Australia? Exp. Appl. Acarol.
DOI 10.1007/a10493-013-9740-4

Webber, H.J. 1967. History and development of the cit-
rus industry. W. Reuter, H.J. Webber, L. D. Batch-
elor (eds.) Univ. of Calif., Div. Agri. Sci., 611 pp.

Xu, X., Wang, B., Wang, E., and Zhang, Z. 2013. Com-
ments on the identity of Neoseiulus californicus
sensu lato (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a redescrip-
tion of this species from southern China. System-
atic & Applied Acarology, 18 (4): 329–344.