SCImago Journal & Country Rank


2018. 26 (2)


About authors:

Carvalho T.A.F., Federal University of Lavras, Department of Entomology, Lavras, Brazil
Reis P.R., Agriculture and Livestock Research Enterprise of Minas Gerais, EPAMIG Sul/EcoCentro, Vicosa, Brazil
Bernardi L.F.O., Federal University of Lavras, Department of Biology, Ecology Sector, Lavras, Brazil
Marafeli P.P., Federal University of Lavras, Department of Entomology, Lavras, Brazil
Martinez P.A., Federal University of Sergipe, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Argentina


The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and abundance of mites in the soil beneath cultivated coffee trees (Coffea arabica L.). In particular, we compared mite communities in three different soil environments: 1) native forest; 2) soils from underneath the coffee trees “under full sun” (i.e. areas that received no additional shade or organic treatment); 3) soils that incorporated organic matter from four leguminous windbreak plant species — acacia, Acacia mangium Wild.; pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.; gliricidia, Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp.; and leucaena, Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Sampling was conducted at the ends of the dry and rainy seasons, in São Sebastião do Paraíso, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Undisturbed soil samples were acquired using a cylinder and a Berlese-Tullgren funnel was used to extract the mites in the laboratory. A total of 1,014 mite specimens, assigned into 143 different species, were collected. The forest soil had the greatest richness and total abundance of edaphic mites, while the coffee plantation soils, enriched with acacia, had the lowest richness and abundance. The mite communities of treated soils were less than 18% similar to that of the forest soil. These results suggest that the substitution of native forests with cultivated systems can cause significant changes in the abundance, richness and structuring of edaphic mite communities, particularly of oribatid mites. Maintenance of mite communities should be one of the goals of agricultural practices, since these organisms are important for maintenance of biological cycles, especially for the decomposition of organic matter.

DOI: 10.21684/0132-8077-2018-26-2-183-195


Badejo, M.A. 1990. Seasonal abundance of soil mites (Acarina) in two contrasting environments. Biotropica, 22: 382–390. 
Badejo, M.A., Aquino, A.M., De-Polli, H. and Fernandes Correia, M.E. 2004. Response of soil mites to organic cultivation in an ultisol in southeast Brazil. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 34: 345–365. 
Bedano, J.C., Cantú, M.P. and Doucet, M.E. 2006. Influence of three different land management practices on soil mite (Arachnida: Acari) densities in relation to a natural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 32: 293–304.
Bedano, J.C. and Ruf, A. 2010. Sensitivity of different taxonomic levels of soil Gamasina to land use and anthropogenic disturbances. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 12: 203–212. 
Behan-Pelletier, V.M. 1999. Oribatid mite biodiversity in agroecosystems: role for bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74: 411–423. 
Camargo, A.J.A., Oliveira, C.M., Frizzas, M.R., Sonoda, K.C. and Corrêa, D.C.V. 2015. Coleções entomológicas: Legislação brasileira, coleta, curadoria e taxonomia para as principais ordens. In: A.J.A. Camargo, C.M. Oliveira, M.R. Frizzas, K.C. Sonoda and D.C.V. Corrêa (Eds.). Embrapa Cerrados, Brasília/Fortaleza. 
Castilho, R.C., Moraes, G.J., Silva, E.S. and Silva, L.O. 2009. Predation potential and biology of Protogamasellopsis posnaniensis Wisniewski and Hirschmann (Acari: Rhodacaridae). Biological Control, 48: 164–167. 
Crossley, D.A., Mueller, B.R. and Perdue, J.C. 1992. Biodiversity of microarthropods in agricultural soils: relations to processes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 40: 37–46. 
Duarte, M.M. 2004. Abundância de microartrópodes do solo em fragmentos de mata com araucária no sul do Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 94: 163–169. 
Evans, D. and Campbell, N.J.H. 2003. Exotic vs endemic biocontrol agents: would the real Stratiolaelaps miles (Berlese) (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae), please stand up? Biological Control, 26: 253–269. 
Hijii, N. et al.1987. Seasonal changes in abundance and spatial distribution of the soil arthropods in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantation, with special reference to Collembola and Acarina. Ecological Research, 159–173. 
Hülsmann, A. and Wolters, V. 1998. The effects of different tillage practices on soil mites, with particular reference to Oribatida. Applied Soil Ecology, 9: 327–332.
Krantz, G.W. and Walter, D.E. (Eds.). 2009. I Manual of Acarology. Third edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas. 
Lindquist, E.E., Krantz, G.W. and Walter, D.E. 2009. Classification. In: G.W. Krantz and D.E. Walter (Eds.). A Manual of Acarology. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, p. 97. 
Marafeli, P.D.P., Reis, P.R., Bernardi, L.F.O. and Martinez, P.A. 2018. Faunistic analysis of soil mites in coffee plantation. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research, 4: 42–58.
Moguel, P. and Toledo, V.M. 1999. Review: Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology, 13: 11–21. 
Morais, J.W., Oliveira, V.S., Dambros, C.S., Tapia-Coral, S.C. and Acioli, A.N.S. 2010. Soil mesofauna in differents systems of land use soil in Upper River Solimões, AM, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 39: 145–152. 
Moreira, G.F., Morais, M.R., Busoli, A.C. and Moraes, G.J. 2015. Life cycle of Cosmolaelaps jaboticabalensis (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and two factitious food sources. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 65: 219–226. 
Oliveira, C.M., Resck, V.D.S. and Frizzas, M.R. 2006. Artrópodes edáficos: influência dos sistemas de preparo do solo e de rotação de culturas. Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina. 
Pepato, A.R. and Klimov, P.B. 2015, Origin and higher-level diversification of acariform mites—evidence from nuclear ribosomal genes, extensive taxon sampling, and secondary structure alignment. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15: 178–198. 
Perfecto, I., Rice, R.A., Greenberg, R. and Voort, M.E 1996. Shade coffee: a disappea refuge for biodiversity. BioScience, 46: 598–608. 
R Core Development Team. 2014. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Rojas, A.B., Castaño-Meneses, G., Palacios-Vargas, J.G. and García-Calderón, N.E. 2009. Oribatid mites and springtails from a coffee plantation in Sierra Sur, Oaxaca, Mexico. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 44: 988–995.
Ruf, A. 1998. A maturity index for predatory soil mites (Mesostigmata: Gamasina) as an indicator of environmental impacts of pollution on forest soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 9: 447–452. 
Ruf, A. and Beck, L. 2005. The use of predatory soil mites in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts, with perspectives for oribatid mites. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62: 290–299. 
Souto, P.C., Souto, J.S., Miranda, J.R.P., Santos, R.V. and Alves, A.R. 2008. Comunidade microbiana e mesofauna edáficas em solo sob caatinga no semi-árido da Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, 32: 151–160. 
Wallace, M.M.H., Tyndale-Bidcoe, M. and Holm, E. 1979. The influence of Macrocheles glaber on the breeding of the Australian bush fly, Musca vetustissima, in cow dung. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Ed.). Recent Advances in Acarology, Vol II. Academic Press, London, pp. 217–222. 
Walter, D.E. and Krantz, G.W. 2009. Collection, rearing, and preparing specimens. In: G.W. Krantz and D.E. Walter (Eds.) Manual of Acarology. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, pp. 83–96.