Issue:
2026. 34 (1)About authors:
Denis A. Popov, e-mail
All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection (VIZR), St. Petersburg, Russia;
Institute of Applied Entomology (INAPPEN), St. Petersburg, Russia
All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection (VIZR), St. Petersburg, Russia
X-BIO Institute, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
X-BIO Institute, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
X-BIO Institute, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia;
Department of Plant Protection, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran;
Department of Plant Protection, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Acknowledgments:
This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation Project No. 24-46-00024.Abstract:
This study has experimentally examined the relative offspring size, the larval feeding behavior and the protonymph resistance to food stress in phytoseiid mites with different food specializations. No correlation was found between egg size and female body size; however, relative egg size varied significantly among species. Among the six examined species, Phytoseiulus persimilis has produced the largest offspring. At the same time, its protonymphs survived for a shorter period in the absence of food, compared with the species producing smaller eggs. For instance, Neoseiulus neoagrestis protonymphs survived up to 6.5 days without food, whereas those of P. persimilis survived only for about 3.8 days under similar conditions. In N. neoagrestis, no differences were observed in the development rates between the non-feeding and feeding larvae, indicating that hunting and feeding are facultative during this stage. Moreover, larvae kept in groups developed faster than those kept individually. This acceleration of development may serve as a strategy to avoid cannibalism, which occurred at the rates of 15–25% in this study and was unaffected by the presence or absence of food. These findings suggest that the tolerance to food stress may represent a valuable screening criterion for selecting new phytoseiid species for biocontrol applications.
References:
Al-Azzazy, M. M., Al-Rehiayani, S. M. and Abdel-Baky, N. F. 2018. Life tables of the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on two pest mites as prey, Aculops lycopersici and Tetranychus urticae. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 51 (11-12): 637–648.
Bakasova, N. F. 1976. [Breeding of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Ath.-Henr. in the autumn-winter period]. Bulletin of VIZR, 38: 3–5. [In Russian]
Beard, J. J. and Walter, G. H. 2001. Host plant specificity in several species of generalist mite predators. Ecological Entomology, 26: 562–570.
Boivin, G. 2010. Reproduction and immature development of egg parasitoids. In: F. L. Consoli, J. R. Parra and R. A. Zucchi (Eds.). Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma. Springer Science and Business Media, pp. 1–23.
Buitenhuis, R., Shipp, L. and Scott-Dupree, C. 2010. Intra-guild vs extra-guild prey: effect on predator fitness and preference of Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 100: 167–173.
Buitenhuis, R., Shipp, L., Scott-Dupree, C., Brommit, A. and Lee, W. 2014. Host plant effects on the behavior and performance of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 62: 171–180.
Charnov, E. L. 2002. Reproductive effort, offspring size and benefit–cost ratios in the classification of life histories. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4: 749–758.
Chittenden, A. R. and Saito, Y. 2001. Why are there feeding and non-feeding larvae in phytoseiid mites (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Journal of Ethology, 19 (1): 55–62.
Church, S. H., Donoughe, S., De Medeiros, B. A. and Extavour, C. G. 2019. Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate. Nature, 571: 58–62.
Croft, B. A., Luh, H.-K. and Schausberger, P. 1999. Larval size relative to larval feeding, cannibalism of larvae, egg or adult female size and larval–adult setal patterns among 13 phytoseiid species. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 23: 1–12.
Ghasemloo, Z., Pakyari, H. and Arbab, A. 2016. Cannibalism and intraguild predation in the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Typhlodromus bagdasarjani (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 42 (3):149–152.
Gotthard, K., Nylin, S. and Wiklund, C. 1994. Adaptive variation in growth rate: life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oecologia, 99: 281–289.
Khanamani, M., Fathipour, Y., Talebi, A. A. and Mehrabadi, M. 2017. Evaluation of different artificial diets for rearing the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae): diet-dependent life table studies. Acarologia, 57 (2): 407–419.
Khaustov, V. A., Döker, I., Joharchi O., Kazakov, D. V., Khaustov, A. A., Moradi, M. and Klimov, P. B. 2022. A new, broadly distributed species of predacious mites, Neoseiulus neoagrestis sp. nov. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) discovered through GenBank data mining and extensive morphological analyses. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 27 (10): 2038–2061.
Knapp, M., van Houten, Y., van Baal, E. and Groot, T. 2018. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarologia, 58: 72–82.
Kolodochka, L. O. 2006. [Phytoseiid mites of Palearctic (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae): faunistics, taxonomy, ecology, evolution]. Vestnik Zoologii, 21: 1250. [In Russian]
Lee, H. S. and Gillespie, D. R. 2011. Life tables and development of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) at different temperatures. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 53: 17–27.
Lv, J., Yang, K., Wang, E. and Xu, X. 2016. Prey diet quality affects predation, oviposition and conversion rate of the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology, 21 (3): 279–287.
McMurtry, J. A. and Croft, B. A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology. 42: 291–321.
McMurtry, J. A., De Moraes, G. J. and Sourassou, N. F. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 18 (4): 297–320.
Pijnakker, J., Vangansbeke, D., Duarte, M., Moerkens, R. and Wäckers, F. L. 2020. Predators and parasitoids-in-first: from inundative releases to preventative biological control in greenhouse crops. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4: 595630.
Saakian-Baranova, A. A. 1990. [Morphological study of preimaginal stages of six species of Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae)]. Entomological Review, 69 (2): 262–263. [In Russian]
Scharf, I., Filin, I. and Ovadia, O. 2009. A trade-off between growth and starvation endurance in a pit-building antlion. Oecologia, 160: 453–460.
Schausberger, P. 2003. Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 29: 173–191.
Schausberger, P. and Croft, B. A. 1999. Activity, feeding, and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environmental Entomology, 28 (2): 322–329.
Stearns, S. C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford university press, New-York. 249 pp. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6020304.x
Stoks, R. 2006. Physiological costs of compensatory growth in a damselfly. Ecology, 87: 1566–1574.
Toyoshima, S. and Amano, H. 1998. Effect of prey density on sex ratio of two predacious mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 22 (12): 709–723.
van Houten, Y. M., Glas, J. J., Hoogerbrugge, H., Rothe, J., Bolckmans, K. J. F., Simoni, S., van Arkel, J., Alba, J. M., Kant, M. R. and Sabelis, M. W. 2013. Herbivory-associated degradation of tomato trichomes and its impact on biological control of Aculops lycopersici. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 60: 127–138.
Walzer, A. 1999. Cannibalism and interspecific predation in the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus: predation rates and effects on reproduction and juvenile development. BioControl, 43: 457–468.
Walzer, A. and Schausberger, P. 2015. Interdependent effects of male and female body size plasticity on mating behavior of predatory mites. Animal Behaviour, 100: 96–105.
Walter, D. E. and Proctor, H. C. 2013. Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behavior: Life at a Microscale. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York. 505 pp.